Skip to main content

Should we get out of providing stockwater?

Me mutu rānei tā mātau whakarato wai kararehe?

We currently operate a stockwater network made up of around 1,600km of channels and related infrastructure to provide water for livestock. About 1,000 properties pay specific rates for the service, and all ratepayers contribute a small amount. These channels are mostly manmade, but some are natural waterways or fed by springs under the Canterbury Plains.

The service is mostly used to provide water for animals, but there are also other benefits such as supporting biodiversity, providing food sources (mahika kai), land drainage, and contributing to community amenities (e.g. supplying water to the Ashburton Domain ponds).

Over the past two decades, some races have been closed, reducing the network from around 4,000km to its current size. Closure requests are regularly received, and we believe that it’s because landowners either don’t use the service or have switched to a different, more efficient service, like piped irrigation.

What are the options?

  • Option 1

    Stay and invest

    We would continue to provide the service, based on the current operation. However, investment would be required to upgrade our ageing assets so that the system remains viable in the future. We would introduce a fairer way to pay for this service, including the community contributing more through the general rate than what is currently charged. Under this option, closures would only be user-driven.


  • Option 2

    Maintain with a closure programme over time

    We would continue to provide the service, based on the current operation. However, investment would be minimal, and assets that fail would not be replaced. Fish screens would be considered, where they were necessary. We would introduce a fairer way of funding this service, including a small community contribution through the general rate.

  • Option 3 (preferred option)

    Exit the stockwater service by 30 June 2027

    We would stop providing stockwater, but we’d still look after specific races that cannot be closed (e.g. due to natural watercourses or ecological benefits). We would develop an active closure programme with targets. The timeframe allows current users of the stockwater to arrange alternative plans. We would introduce a fairer way of funding until we have exited this service. From 1 July 2027, the general rate would likely cover the remaining system.

Option Analysis

Learn more about the costs, advantages and disadvantages of each option.

What will it cost?

Advantages & Disadvantages

As part of this option, we would need to install fish screens on key locations as required under the Canterbury Regional Land and Water Plan. This would be a significant expense for Council.

Capital: Unknown

Operating: $1.28-$1.32 million annually + inflation

Debt: Unknown, depending on capital expenditure needed

Rates: It varies for individual properties that pay for the service. There is a proposal to increase the minimum charge to $700 in this LTP. All ratepayers contribute a small portion through the General rate.

Advantages

  • Current users would continue to receive this service.
  • Biodiversity and community benefits from the stockwater system would be maintained.

Disadvantages

  • High investment required to maintain levels of service for a relatively small number of users.
  • Still an inefficient approach to delivering water for agricultural purposes.

What will it cost?

Advantages & Disadvantages

Investment would be minimal, and assets that fail would not be replaced. Fish screens would be considered, where they were necessary.

Capital: Unknown

Operating: $1.28-$1.32 million annually + inflation

Debt: Unknown, depending on capital expenditure needed

Rates: It varies for individual properties that pay for the service. There is a proposal to increase the minimum charge to $700 in this LTP. All ratepayers contribute a small portion through the General rate.

Advantages

  • Current users would continue to receive this service.
  • Biodiversity and community benefits from the stockwater system would be maintained.

Disadvantages

  • Still an inefficient approach to delivering water for agricultural purposes.
  • No active investment may compromise the future of the system.
  • No planned approach to decommission the system would lead to poorer outcomes.
  • Current users would bear the burden of the scheme.
  • Less certainty.

What will it cost?

Advantages & Disadvantages

Investment would be minimal and assets that fail would not be replaced. We would not actively build fish screens.

Capital: Unknown

Operating: $1.45-$1.48 million until Year 3 + inflation. Additional cost of $175,000 annually is to pay for the work needed to exit the service.

Debt: $0

Rates: It varies for individual properties that pay for the service. There is a proposal to increase the minimum charge to $700 in this LTP. Under this option, all ratepayers would contribute a bit more through the General rate to fund work needed to exit the service.

Advantages

  • Current users would continue to receive this service until closure.
  • Biodiversity and community benefits from the stockwater system would be maintained before and after exit.
  • Water would be better managed.

Disadvantages

  • Some customers may not want their race closed or may not have an alternative source of stockwater.
  • May be a need to collect more money from the general ratepayer.

Provide a short summary of your question.

You have 150 characters left

Provide detailed information relating to your question.

You have 500 characters left

Select a respondent from the list that you would most like to answer your question.

Moderation Policy

These are the people that are listening and responding to your questions.

LTP Team

{{ question.username }} asked

{{question.description}}

{{ answer.respondent.name }}
| Edited

Answer this question

Select the respondent who will be marked as answering the question

Provide the answer to the question. Answer can be saved as draft and published when complete.

No questions found

Contact Us

Have questions or want to learn more about a project, contact us below:

Phone 03-307 7700
Email info@adc.govt.nz
Website www.ashburtondc.govt.nz
In writing

2 Baring Square East, Ashburton 7700